In case you haven't heard, meaning you have not read world news the past several days or did not see the story, there has been a coup d'etat in Thailand by the army there. The Guardian seemed to have plenty of insight on the issue, and The Economist has a detailed look at the matter (they got a new site layout too). There has been no shortage of dialogue on the topic — as is the case in nearly any newsworthy event.
I think that is there is a coup, the people should lead it. Why is it that the military led the overthrow of the government, and the poor now feel abandoned? I remember reading an article (which I subsequently forgot to bookmark or email to myself) in which a lower-class taxi driver was interviewed. He said that the former government had been — however corrupt — good for the poor in the country. I have failed to read thoroughly about Thai politics, but I will be sure to in the coming days... maybe by then my position will change. For now, I am still in the middle.
technorati tags: politics, thailand, thai, guardian, economist, coup, d'etat, news, current+affairs, government, coup+d'etat
Thursday, 21 September 2006
Coup coup cachoo
Posted by clearthought at 10:54 pm
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment